A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Iván Humberto Escrucería Mayolo
✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente recurso de reposición y en subsidio de apelación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
El peticionario presentó recurso de reposición y en subsidio de apelación en contra del auto que dispuso no acceder a la petición de declaración de incumplimiento integral de las órdenes contenidas en la sentencia T-760/08.
La Sala de Seguimiento considera que los recursos formulados resultan improcedentes y, en tal sentido, decide RECHAZARLOS.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. Rechazar por improcedente el recurso de reposicion y en subsidio de apelacion, interpuesto por el senor Luis Arcesio Garcia Perdomo contra el Auto de 3 de febrero de 2017, conforme a lo dispuesto en la parte motiva de la presente providencia.
- SEGUNDO. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. La Secretaria General de esta Corporacion expedira la comunicacion correspondiente, adjuntando copia de este auto.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.